When it comes to hurting our economy what person is worse, International Terrorists of Large Unions? The reason I ask is straightforward, you observe we are in the Presidential Election year, with under 100-days to look, and also the two candidates are discussing outsourcing American Jobs and debating why companies are leaving the US hoping less hostile business environments; lower corporate taxes, few class action lawsuits, simpler regulations, and much less grief from unions. Okay how about we talk about that’s really hurting our economy shall we?
There was an intriguing article that appeared in News and World Report on September 7, 2015 titled: “With contract expiration nearing, UAW chief says he hasn’t picked an automobile company to,” by Tom Krisher, Associated Press Auto Writer – which stated:
“… UAW President Dennis Williams said Monday he’ll pick between Ford, General Motors and Fiat Chrysler,” and “Speaking after Detroit’s annual Labor Day parade, Williams didn’t address whether or not the contracts can be extended and gave no specifics of how the talks for about 140,000 personnel are progressing; ‘Everybody says for me ‘Dennis, maybe you’ve picked a target?’ Yes. General Motors, Ford and Chrysler,’ Williams believed to applause within a post-parade speech. But afterward he told reporters which he would go with a single company when the current four-year contracts end.”
At enough time of that article about one-year ago – The UAW (United Auto Workers) president stated he hasn’t decided, or THEY haven’t decided which car company to TARGET yet. WOW, some other sector in this economy and they’d face a Federal Indictment for conspiring like this. I am pissed with the double-standards we’ve got in this Great Nation. It’s pathetic permitting the UAW to achieve this. Totally pathetic, Ayn Rand was right. Is this really about collective bargaining or perhaps is this about collective terrorizing.
And, what the results are if companies don’t acquiesce? Simple, the union members will become thugs, vandalize cars of “scabs” those workers who cross the picket lines, and harass management, part-time workers and lobby to have government to return in well as over regulate and fine the lenders into exhaustion until they furnish up and settle. Wow, so what is the definition of terrorism again?
“The usage of violence and intimidation inside pursuit of political aims.”
Yep, this is the definition plus it sure fits these actions right? So, in the event the democrats sponsor big labor unions, does that mean they can be sponsoring terrorism? Well? Does it?